|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: pam_listfile is *buggy* (and a replacement)
From: David Lee (T.D.Lee
durham.ac.uk)Date: Mon Dec 18 2000 - 03:54:05 CST
- Next message: Steve Conzett: "cistron and RedHat's pam - limiting lgin attempts"
- Previous message: Steve Langasek: "Re: Security problem in pam_unix?"
- In reply to: Michael Tokarev: "pam_listfile is *buggy* (and a replacement)"
- Reply: David Lee: "Re: pam_listfile is *buggy* (and a replacement)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Folks! This is me again. I'm sorry, but I'm afraid of bugs
> in PAM modules... I tried to reimplement pam_unix, and pam_cracklib --
> after finding many bugs there. Now it is pam_listfile, and
> now I have a replacement. Original one is *buggy*!...
By coincidence, a colleague here in Durham asked me a few days ago if I
was still involved with Linux-PAM, because he had some possible patches
for some problems in "pam_listfile()".
Alas, he has just gone on holiday for a few days, and hasn't left me any
details at all. But I'll give him the infomation in this email thread, so
that this activity can be coordinated.
--: David Lee I.T. Service : : Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : University of Durham : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road : : Durham : : Phone: +44 191 374 2882 U.K. :
_______________________________________________ Pam-list mailing list Pam-list
redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
- Next message: Steve Conzett: "cistron and RedHat's pam - limiting lgin attempts"
- Previous message: Steve Langasek: "Re: Security problem in pam_unix?"
- In reply to: Michael Tokarev: "pam_listfile is *buggy* (and a replacement)"
- Reply: David Lee: "Re: pam_listfile is *buggy* (and a replacement)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]