|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: PAM configuration
From: Damien Miller (djm
mindrot.org)Date: Wed Dec 27 2000 - 02:10:17 CST
- Next message: Pekka Savola: "Re: PAM configuration"
- Previous message: Damien Miller: "PAM configuration"
- Next in thread: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon: "Re: [PAM] Re: PAM configuration"
- Next in thread: Daniel T. Chen: "Re: PAM configuration"
- Maybe reply: Damien Miller: "Re: PAM configuration"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Pekka Savola wrote:
> > - Does FreeBSD and other systems where PAM is a port or addon still
> > use /etc/pam.d?
>
> FreeBSD (as of 4.2) uses only /etc/pam.conf.
Does it include usable defaults (i.e. ones that will allow password
auth to proceed) when no explicit configuration is found?
-d
-- | ``We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on | Damien Miller - | a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the | <djmmindrot.org> | works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, / | we know this is not true.'' - Robert Wilensky UCB / http://www.mindrot.org
_______________________________________________ Pam-list mailing list Pam-list
redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
- Next message: Pekka Savola: "Re: PAM configuration"
- Previous message: Damien Miller: "PAM configuration"
- Next in thread: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon: "Re: [PAM] Re: PAM configuration"
- Next in thread: Daniel T. Chen: "Re: PAM configuration"
- Maybe reply: Damien Miller: "Re: PAM configuration"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]