|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Rick Goyette (rjgoyette
anl.gov)Date: Thu Feb 08 2001 - 10:55:54 CST
That works nicely. One thing: This assumes that all passwords are
handled through the NIS server. What if a system, in addition to
allowing NIS users, also had a few local accounts. Is there a way
for pam to distinguish between the two, and not use nis to change the
password for a local account?
>On Thu, 08 Feb 2001, Rick Goyette wrote:
>
>> So you use pam_unix instead of pam_pwdb? Is there any practical
>> difference in behavior between the two?
>
>pam_unix's NIS support is one, full shadow support is another.
>You don't need any extra libraries for it (unlike pwdb), just (g)libc.
>And I (re)wrote it/made it work as it's now ;)
>
>Jan
>--
>Jan Reœkorajski | ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
>baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
>BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pam-list mailing list
>Pam-list
redhat.com
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
-- R. J. Goyette Argonne National Laboratory rjgoyetteanl.gov (630) 252-4328
_______________________________________________ Pam-list mailing list Pam-list
redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]