On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Wil Cooley wrote:

> Thus spake Andrew Morgan:
> > I've been playing with it some more and I'm still not convinced you've
> > covered the half of it. BTW all the libpam*s can be built as debugging
> > libraries too.
>
> Wouldn't suprise me, I don't really even know what it's for; I only
> looked far enough to see why it wasn't building.
>
> > I've filed a bug for this and will commit some code this weekend to fix
> > it.
> >
> > http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=131783&group_id=6663
>
> Okay. I'm still getting the same error when configuring with
> '--enable-static-libpam'; I don't know if that's a known problem or not
> (didn't see it in bug database).

Looking longer-term: Has the time come to consider using GNU libtool?

I realise that "libtool" has not been perfect in the past! But looking to
the future, it would be worth giving consideration to such a transition,
especially as it is the intention to make (so-called) Linux-PAM portable
to systems other than Linux.

-- 
:  David Lee                                I.T. Service          :
:  Systems Programmer                       Computer Centre       :
:                                           University of Durham  :
:  http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/            South Road            :
:                                           Durham                :
:  Phone: +44 191 374 2882                  U.K.                  :
_______________________________________________
Pam-list mailing list
Pam-listredhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]