Ondrej Svetlik wrote:
> int myConv(int numMsg, const struct pam_message **msg,
> struct pam_response **response, void *appdataPtr)
[snip]
> *resp = reply;

I'm assuming that was supposed to be:

   *response = reply;

to match the function header since resp isn't declared anywhere. I've
also just realized the unusual way *appdataPtr is used to pass data in
from the app.

I would also assume that you could stick the code to obtain the username
and password directly in the conversation function's code- but it's
probably a good idea not to.

> case PAM_PROMPT_ECHO_OFF: /* ? password */
> case PAM_PROMPT_ECHO_ON: /* ? username */
  
How reliable are these correlations? (echo-off for username, echo-on
for password)

Many thanks for the example; it's starting to make a little more sense
now.

-kgd

-- 
Money is overrated.
_______________________________________________
Pam-list mailing list
Pam-listredhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]