Re: PATCH: transport maps work for local users and full addresses

Andrew McNamara (andrewmconnect.com.au)
Wed, 17 Nov 1999 10:46:17 +1100

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: PATCH: transport maps work for local users and full addresses"
• Previous message: Simon J Mudd: "Re: Comparison of RPMs"
• Next in thread: Martin Schulze: "Re: PATCH: transport maps work for local users and full addresses"

>You may have noticed that other Postfix tables use different
>notations for users and domains. For example
>
> user domain (smtpd access maps)
> user domain (canonical, virtual maps)
>
>Given that we're overhauling the transport table semantics I
>would not be too concerned about bass-ackwards compatibility.

Personally, I prefer the former (usernames must be terminated by
an ). The virtual map always bites me. 8-)

>Inparticular, it would be even cooler if the recipient could also
>be "rewritten" with the transport table.

Any theories about syntax?

   some.dom.ain smtp:some.dom.ain smtp:useranother.dom.ain

Seems logical, I guess. Certainly gives people plenty of rope when
combined with regexp maps... 8-)

 ---
Andrew McNamara (System Architect)

connect.com.au Pty Ltd
Lvl 3, 213 Miller St, North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia
Phone: +61 2 9409 2117, Fax: +61 2 9409 2111

• Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: PATCH: transport maps work for local users and full addresses"
• Previous message: Simon J Mudd: "Re: Comparison of RPMs"
• Next in thread: Martin Schulze: "Re: PATCH: transport maps work for local users and full addresses"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue Nov 16 1999 - 17:46:48 CST