Re: Which is better? Postfix, qmail, exim or zmailer ?

Michael Graff (explorerflame.org)
22 Nov 1999 13:47:34 -0800

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: How to block this spam?"
• Previous message: Amos Gouaux: "Re: Which is better? Postfix, qmail, exim or zmailer ?"
• In reply to: Michael Graff: "Re: Which is better? Postfix, qmail, exim or zmailer ?"
• Next in thread: Bennett Todd: "Re: Which is better? Postfix, qmail, exim or zmailer ?"
• Next in thread: Amos Gouaux: "Re: Which is better? Postfix, qmail, exim or zmailer ?"
• Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: Which is better? Postfix, qmail, exim or zmailer ?"

Bennett Todd <betmordor.net> writes:

> As I see it, what you are saying is, postfix can do the job just fine (using
> procmail), but you don't like procmail's API, you like qmail's instead, and
> you can't whack out a

external programs just to get your mail... But from a purely
functional standpoint, qmail does more out of the box in the area of
"extra" addresses users can create.

But as I've said many, many times, I want to switch from qmail to
postfix. I really, really want to. But I need that functionality
first.

--Michael

• Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: How to block this spam?"
• Previous message: Amos Gouaux: "Re: Which is better? Postfix, qmail, exim or zmailer ?"
• In reply to: Michael Graff: "Re: Which is better? Postfix, qmail, exim or zmailer ?"
• Next in thread: Bennett Todd: "Re: Which is better? Postfix, qmail, exim or zmailer ?"
• Next in thread: Amos Gouaux: "Re: Which is better? Postfix, qmail, exim or zmailer ?"
• Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: Which is better? Postfix, qmail, exim or zmailer ?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon Nov 22 1999 - 15:48:38 CST