|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
[OT] sendmail 8.x.y not ESMTP PIPELINING/reading -bs BSMTP input
Matthias Andree (mandree
dosis.uni-dortmund.de)
24 Nov 1999 02:56:17 +0100
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Efficacy of "check_relay_domains""
- Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: Postfix snapshot 19991122 available"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: Postfix snapshot 19991122 available"
- Next in thread: Lorens Kockum: "Re: Which is better? Postfix, qmail, exim or zmailer ?"
wietse
porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes:
> Unfortunately, the widely-used sendmail SMTP server cannot support
> ESMTP command pipelining without major surgery. Sendmail fork()s
> one child per MAIL FROM that exits after "." or RSET, and the child
> would read too much input because of stdio buffering.
Thanks for this compact explanation, that's the one I had been looking
for. I was aware of sendmail fork()s, but did not take stdin buffering
into account.
-- Matthias AndreeHi! I'm the infamous .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Efficacy of "check_relay_domains""
- Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: Postfix snapshot 19991122 available"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: Postfix snapshot 19991122 available"
- Next in thread: Lorens Kockum: "Re: Which is better? Postfix, qmail, exim or zmailer ?"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue Nov 23 1999 - 20:26:45 CST