Re: Snapshot 19991123 $mydestination vs. transport?

Amos Gouaux (amos+lists.postfixutdallas.edu)
29 Nov 1999 09:13:47 -0600

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Mark Martinec: "Re: Duplication Supression..."
• Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Temporary mail accepter - approx 1 week - how easily?"
• In reply to: KThorpe: "Temporary mail accepter - approx 1 week - how easily?"

>>>>> On 29 Nov 1999 14:04:51 +0100,
>>>>> Simon J Mudd <simon.muddalltrading.com> (sjm) writes:

sjm> I agree with your reasoning. I guess Wietse is trying to rethink how
sjm> to fit the various pieces together. Removing mydestination from
sjm> main.cf, and relying exclusively on transport might be cleaner if
sjm> transport wasn't an option file.

This, as many others before it, has been an interesting thread.
Must admit I find the logic of dispensing with mydestination and
simply relying on the transport map clean and tidy. If
mydestination is dropped, perhaps Postfix could issue a warning upon
startup if it did not find a transport entry relating to the local
machine, especially if there is one for the domain.

Amos

• Next message: Mark Martinec: "Re: Duplication Supression..."
• Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Temporary mail accepter - approx 1 week - how easily?"
• In reply to: KThorpe: "Temporary mail accepter - approx 1 week - how easily?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon Nov 29 1999 - 09:15:56 CST