Re: outlook and postfix

Subject: Re: outlook and postfix
From: Amos Gouaux (amos+lists.postfixutdallas.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 16 1999 - 11:36:59 CST

• Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: UCE controls: check previous hops in headers"
• Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: UCE controls: check previous hops in headers"
• Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: outlook and postfix"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 11:01:43 +0100,
>>>>> Ralf Hildebrandt <R.Hildebrandttu-bs.de> (rh) writes:

rh> a) this feature is crap. At least the way it's implemented in
rh> the OutlookExpress Server. This piece of junk answers to all mails (except
rh> bounces). Bulk, everything. I just hate it if I post to a mailinglist
rh> and get 10+ braindead "we can't use vacation correctly thus we use
rh> Exchange"-users messages back, telling me "I'm out of office..."

Oh yeah, tell me about it. Man do I see a lot of these. It
*almost* makes me want to block that site. ;-)

rh> b) Out of Outlook you can't do that.
rh> The workaround: put vacation in the .forward file of the user

Has anybody here seen how well the Cyrus Sieve vacation mechanism
handles this? I'm assuming it would be no worse than using the
.forward mechanism....

Amos

• Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: UCE controls: check previous hops in headers"
• Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: UCE controls: check previous hops in headers"
• Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: outlook and postfix"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Thu Dec 16 1999 - 11:39:08 CST