|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects
Subject: Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects
From: Wietse Venema (wietse
porcupine.org)
Date: Mon Dec 20 1999 - 07:58:22 CST
- Next message: Michael Sobolev: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
- In reply to: Michael Sobolev: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Sobolev:
> Why the default value for rejecting spam is 4xx and not 5xx?
How do you know it is spam? Postfix just plays safe, and delays
mail rather than losing it.
As long as the mail does not get through, it just pollutes the
logging.
Wietse
- Next message: Michael Sobolev: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
- In reply to: Michael Sobolev: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Mon Dec 20 1999 - 08:09:12 CST