Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects

Subject: Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects
From: Michael Sobolev (msstransas.com)
Date: Mon Dec 20 1999 - 08:04:30 CST

• Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
• Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
• In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 08:55:28AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Some systems retry within a minute, and that is excessive.
That's why I asked. :)

> On the other hand, I've found that insisting on DNS confirmation
> for client hostname and HELO parameters loses too much of my mail.
It's not my case. I have carefully checked the logs for few months now,
and I can hardly remember a case, when a rejected mail was not a spam.

Thanks for the explanation.

--
Mike

• Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
• Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
• In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Mon Dec 20 1999 - 08:13:57 CST