|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects
Subject: Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects
From: Wietse Venema (wietse
porcupine.org)
Date: Mon Dec 20 1999 - 09:02:46 CST
- Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "offtopic: syslog-ng or LaMont J. to the rescue..."
- Previous message: ibrahim khalifa: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
- In reply to: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 08:55:28AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > On the other hand, I've found that insisting on DNS confirmation
> > for client hostname and HELO parameters loses too much of my mail.
>
> Really? I tend to get this kind of stuff:
[stuff]
It does stop a lot of junk mail, and I wish I could use it to keep
out the garbage from clueless spammers/spamware.
Unfortuately, it blocks too much of my legitimate mail as well.
Wietse
- Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "offtopic: syslog-ng or LaMont J. to the rescue..."
- Previous message: ibrahim khalifa: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
- In reply to: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Mon Dec 20 1999 - 09:05:22 CST