|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects
Subject: Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects
From: Baron Fujimoto (baron
lava.net)
Date: Mon Dec 20 1999 - 14:47:28 CST
- Next message: Lutz Jaenicke: "Re: port 113"
- Previous message: Chip Christian: "Re: postfix/procmail"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Wietse Venema wrote:
: Advantage of tagging over rejecting is that filtering is under
: control by the end user.
Speaking as the postmaster for an ISP, we would very much like to see this
as an option.
- Next message: Lutz Jaenicke: "Re: port 113"
- Previous message: Chip Christian: "Re: postfix/procmail"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: 4xx vs 5xx for spam rejects"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Mon Dec 20 1999 - 14:56:14 CST