Re: 19991231 and transport map

Subject: Re: 19991231 and transport map
From: Giulio Orsero (giulioopobox.com)
Date: Sun Jan 02 2000 - 09:44:03 CST

• Next message: Khetan Gajjar: "Re: local_recipient_maps rejects for non-local virtual users ?"
• Previous message: Diego Dainese: "Re: Server with dynamic IP address"
• In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: 19991231 and transport map"
• Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: 19991231 and transport map"
• Reply: Giulio Orsero: "Re: 19991231 and transport map"
• Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: 19991231 and transport map"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 2 Jan 2000 09:30:41 -0500 (EST), hai scritto:

>> 1) I have added in master.cf
>> lansmtp unix - - n - - smtp
>> smtp is deferred, lansmtp is not.
>> ...

>Please, do not give edited examples of config files when filing
>a problem report.

Ok, sorry.
Then I use the default master.cf.
smtp is not deferred.

I put
myhost smtp:[ip.address.of.myhost]
in transport
myhost is an hostname, not fqdn.

with the old version postfix delivers the mail for usermyhost
immediately, with the new version it does a MX dns lookup.

My question is:
If I put something like
myhost smtp:[ip.address.of.myhost]
in transport, should postfix deliver mail for usermyhost to the
ip.address.of.myhost directly without any dns lookup?
Is this changed with the new release (I used the last official release
before the new one)?

Thanks.

-- 
giulioopobox.com

• Next message: Khetan Gajjar: "Re: local_recipient_maps rejects for non-local virtual users ?"
• Previous message: Diego Dainese: "Re: Server with dynamic IP address"
• In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: 19991231 and transport map"
• Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: 19991231 and transport map"
• Reply: Giulio Orsero: "Re: 19991231 and transport map"
• Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: 19991231 and transport map"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Sun Jan 02 2000 - 10:04:44 CST