Re: stunnel and tcp-wrappers/spop3 and simap4

Subject: Re: stunnel and tcp-wrappers/spop3 and simap4
From: erekose (erekosechloe.mine.nu)
Date: Mon Jan 03 2000 - 10:14:06 CST

• Next message: erekose: "Re: stunnel and tcp-wrappers/spop3 and simap4"
• Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: no postfix/qmgr in my logfile"
• In reply to: tim: "stunnel and tcp-wrappers/spop3 and simap4"
• Reply: erekose: "Re: stunnel and tcp-wrappers/spop3 and simap4"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

U could liase directly with Michael Trojnara, the author of stunnel
... BTW, there R a few other options available w/ stunnel that could
strengthen the encrytion used .. if U R using the default pem file, then I
suggest U create a new one .. the default pem only use 512 bit.

IMHO, so not run stunnel thru inetd. Also, tcp wrapper is not necessary
when U use stunnel.

On Mon, 3 Jan 2000, tim wrote:

>
> hallo!
>
> I hope that this isn't too much off topic ... but I've installed stunnel
> and the tcp_wrappers. What I would like to have is that when one gets
> his mail, through pop3 or through imap, that the connection is encypted.
>
> With stunnel installed, you have spop3 and simap4 ... however, I need to
> learn more about this. Does anyone know of a good site for this info?
>
> What does one need on the client side?
>
> cheesr,
>
> tim
>
>

• Next message: erekose: "Re: stunnel and tcp-wrappers/spop3 and simap4"
• Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: no postfix/qmgr in my logfile"
• In reply to: tim: "stunnel and tcp-wrappers/spop3 and simap4"
• Reply: erekose: "Re: stunnel and tcp-wrappers/spop3 and simap4"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Mon Jan 03 2000 - 10:17:08 CST