|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: Wieste, Date problem?
Subject: Re: Wieste, Date problem?
From: Matthias Andree (ma
dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de)
Date: Mon Jan 03 2000 - 11:39:27 CST
- Next message: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: Postfix Maintenance?"
- Previous message: Christopher Petrilli: "Re: Postfix Maintenance?"
- Maybe reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: Wieste, Date problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson <insane
lunatic.oneinsane.net> writes:
> On your mail with the patch 01 here is a short snippit from the header.
>
> Subject: Postfix 19991231 Patch 01 (Safety Net)
> To: postfix-announce
postfix.org (Postfix announce)
> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 100 18:18:31 -0500 (EST)
> Cc: postfix-users
postfix.org (Postfix users)
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
> From: wietse
porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)
>
> Take a good look at the date line ;-)
Get the source, plug some "+1900" in the right place (near localtime
somewhere), eventually change %2d or %02d to %4d and you're set. Or
recompile with current libraries (strftime issue)?
Or dump elm and switch to mutt :^)
-- Matthias AndreeHi! I'm the infamous .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
- Next message: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: Postfix Maintenance?"
- Previous message: Christopher Petrilli: "Re: Postfix Maintenance?"
- Maybe reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: Wieste, Date problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Mon Jan 03 2000 - 12:27:01 CST