Re: stoppping empty To: <>

Subject: Re: stoppping empty To: <>
From: Ralf Hildebrandt (R.Hildebrandttu-bs.de)
Date: Fri Jan 07 2000 - 09:05:53 CST

• Next message: Andreas Siegert: "Re: trouble running postfix"
• Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: stoppping empty To: <>"
• In reply to: Vivek Khera: "Re: stoppping empty To: <>"
• Next in thread: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: stoppping empty To: <>"
• Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: stoppping empty To: <>"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 09:56:29AM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> Which is different than a null recipient, which is what this question
> is about.

See http://msgs.SecurePoint.com/cgi-bin/get/postfix9909/143/4.html
(I think)

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt <R.Hildebrandttu-bs.de> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
The Imperial Vendor or Contractor probably told them that droid armies
don't need redundant command centers, nor any kind of high availability ...
you're supposed to buy several, and cluster them. 
Redundant Array of Inexpensive Droids? 

• Next message: Andreas Siegert: "Re: trouble running postfix"
• Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: stoppping empty To: <>"
• In reply to: Vivek Khera: "Re: stoppping empty To: <>"
• Next in thread: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: stoppping empty To: <>"
• Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: stoppping empty To: <>"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Fri Jan 07 2000 - 09:10:51 CST