Re: Locking hell

Subject: Re: Locking hell
From: Anand Buddhdev (arbanand.org)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2000 - 08:44:33 CST

• Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Locking hell"
• Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Locking hell"
• In reply to: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Locking hell"
• Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Locking hell"
• Reply: Anand Buddhdev: "Re: Locking hell"
• Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Locking hell"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 03:24:59PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 05:17:42PM +0300, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
>
> > common locking scheme? Huh? What's that? ;-) You'd be better off using
> > Maildir format over such a mix of NFS.
>
> Gna!! Any POP3/IMAP4 daemons support that?

For POP: qmail-pop3d (www.qmail.org) and solidpop3 (www.freshmeat.net)

For IMAP: courierimap (www.inter7.com/courierimap). There's also a
patched UW_IMAP that works with Maildirs, but you'll have to search the
qmail archives to find out about it. I don't have a URL handy. In any
case, courierimap is much smaller, faster, and flexible.

-- 
See complete headers for more info

• Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Locking hell"
• Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Locking hell"
• In reply to: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Locking hell"
• Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Locking hell"
• Reply: Anand Buddhdev: "Re: Locking hell"
• Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Locking hell"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Thu Jan 20 2000 - 08:46:22 CST