Good high volume IMAP daemon

Subject: Good high volume IMAP daemon
From: Baribault, Gary (gary.baribaultvideotron.ca)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2000 - 21:16:06 CST

• Next message: Jason Hoos: "Re: Port of sendmail SUNET_ID_HASH fn for LDAP map?"
• Previous message: Rich Graves: "Port of sendmail SUNET_ID_HASH fn for LDAP map?"
• Next in thread: Bennett Todd: "Re: Good high volume IMAP daemon"
• Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: Good high volume IMAP daemon"
• Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: Good high volume IMAP daemon"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello Folks,

        I have been having fun with Postfix in a personal testing environment for
a while now and will be setting up a new server in a production environment
soon. I have decided to use something more robust and secure than pop3
(have been using gnu-pop3d) but am trying to decide what. Should I use a
IMAP daemon? which one? Do most Windows client software (Outlook, Eudora
etc) support APOP?

        I expect to start small (2000 - 4000) customers but may very well increase
to 10-15000 soon.

        Is there some way to support Outlook calendering on Postfix?

Thanks

Gary B

• application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

• Next message: Jason Hoos: "Re: Port of sendmail SUNET_ID_HASH fn for LDAP map?"
• Previous message: Rich Graves: "Port of sendmail SUNET_ID_HASH fn for LDAP map?"
• Next in thread: Bennett Todd: "Re: Good high volume IMAP daemon"
• Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: Good high volume IMAP daemon"
• Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: Good high volume IMAP daemon"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Thu Jan 20 2000 - 21:21:37 CST