OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
Postfix Archives: Re: Port of sendmail SUNET_ID_HASH fn for LDA

Re: Port of sendmail SUNET_ID_HASH fn for LDAP map?

Subject: Re: Port of sendmail SUNET_ID_HASH fn for LDAP map?
From: Jason Hoos (jhoosthwack.net)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2000 - 22:36:21 CST

I considered it, but I was lazy. :) Since it was just a variation on the
existing LDAP map type, and that map type already has a nice means of giving
configuration parameters to it, it seemed simpler to just make it another
configuration parameter.

I haven't messed with the recipient or virtual maps much yet, but I would
presume that since an LDAP map can normally be used in these, that this
patch shouldn't change that any. I did put in the check to not strip dots
from domain names, so hopefully things will still act as expected if you
search on an LDAP field containing things like "joebobsome.domain.com".

Jason Hoos
jhoosthwack.net

----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew McNamara <andrewmconnect.com.au>
To: Jason Hoos <jhoosthwack.net>
Cc: <postfix-userspostfix.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: Port of sendmail SUNET_ID_HASH fn for LDAP map?

> >You're in luck; I just happen to have a patch that does exactly this,
> >since we were also using that feature of sendmail. I've attached it.
> >The patch was originally done against version 19990906-pl09. I haven't
> >tried it against the newest release (although I hopefully will soon),
> >so if it doesn't work let me know.
>
> Did you consider implementing this as a new map type? Then you would
> enable it as a recipient_canonical_maps, or virtual_maps entry.
>
> ---
> Andrew McNamara (System Architect)
>
> connect.com.au Pty Ltd
> Lvl 3, 213 Miller St, North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia
> Phone: +61 2 9409 2117, Fax: +61 2 9409 2111
>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Thu Jan 20 2000 - 22:41:23 CST