Re: "hold" queues and ETRN

Subject: Re: "hold" queues and ETRN
From: jfeslergigo.com
Date: Wed Jan 26 2000 - 11:56:22 CST

• Next message: Syed Khader Vali: "Local Mailing and masquerading"
• Previous message: Xavier Beaudouin: "Hints about local_recipient_maps and mysql / ldap maps ."
• In reply to: David Behr: ""hold" queues and ETRN"
• Next in thread: Craig Sanders: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Next in thread: Ricardo D. Albano: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Reply: jfeslergigo.com: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Reply: Craig Sanders: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Has the "hold" queue been implemented in Postfix yet? I know it wasn't a
> while back.

Nope.

> If it's not, how can I (as an ISP) hold back mail for dial-up servers that
> want to connect and issue an ETRN command to get their mail? I have a client
> with MS Exchange server.

"Just do it." For most reasonable dialup people it will work fine.
ETRN itself works - it's just not in the form that the ISP world wants
(ie, ETRN will run the entire queue - not just one domain; and no hold
queue).

• Next message: Syed Khader Vali: "Local Mailing and masquerading"
• Previous message: Xavier Beaudouin: "Hints about local_recipient_maps and mysql / ldap maps ."
• In reply to: David Behr: ""hold" queues and ETRN"
• Next in thread: Craig Sanders: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Next in thread: Ricardo D. Albano: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Reply: jfeslergigo.com: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Reply: Craig Sanders: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Wed Jan 26 2000 - 11:58:17 CST