Re: "hold" queues and ETRN

Subject: Re: "hold" queues and ETRN
From: jfeslergigo.com
Date: Wed Jan 26 2000 - 16:26:32 CST

• Next message: Craig Sanders: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Previous message: jfeslergigo.com: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• In reply to: Craig Sanders: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Next in thread: Ricardo D. Albano: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Reply: jfeslergigo.com: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> but only if they have a static IP. if they have a dynamically allocated

Indeed. This discussion is entirely moot if they don't have a
static IP address. If this can't be handled, go to UUCP over TCP.

From an ISP perspective, it's just a lot more reliable and even
worthwhile to get static IP's working. OSPF works wonders. We required
users to call one pop consistantly - but as long as they did that, they
could hit _any_ of our terminal servers at the pop, and get their static
IP, get their mail, and get the heck off. It worked very smoothly, and we
made a bundle from it.

• Next message: Craig Sanders: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Previous message: jfeslergigo.com: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• In reply to: Craig Sanders: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Next in thread: Ricardo D. Albano: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Reply: jfeslergigo.com: "Re: "hold" queues and ETRN"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Wed Jan 26 2000 - 16:28:00 CST