|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: qmail, from bugtraq
From: Christopher Petrilli (petrilli
amber.org)Date: Mon Jan 31 2000 - 12:04:11 CST
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Previous message: Bennett Todd: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- In reply to: Bennett Todd: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Next in thread: Bennett Todd: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Reply: Christopher Petrilli: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bennett Todd [bet
rahul.net] wrote:
> 2000-01-31-12:31:31 Chip Christian:
> > I like Bernstein's confidence:
>
> So do I.
I believe the point though was that Wietse would never state categorically
that Postfix is "perfect," simply that it has no known holes. To state
that it has ZERO defects is an act of arrogance, not engineering.
Chris
-- | Christopher Petrilli | petrilliamber.org
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Previous message: Bennett Todd: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- In reply to: Bennett Todd: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Next in thread: Bennett Todd: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Reply: Christopher Petrilli: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]