|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: smart anti flood tools
From: Bennett Todd (bet
rahul.net)Date: Wed Feb 02 2000 - 09:03:16 CST
- Next message: Chris Horry: "Re: Forced delivery"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Forced delivery"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: smart anti flood tools"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: smart anti flood tools"
- Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: smart anti flood tools"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: smart anti flood tools"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2000-02-02-09:50:37 Wietse Venema:
> I think the mail flood stopper can be simpler than the
> pop-before-smtp tool, for the simple reason that it is probably
> sufficient if the tool only creates blocks; a companion tool would
> remove blocks on request.
I buy that.
Anybody want to suggest criteria for defining what constitutes a
mail flood? Once we know what we're looking for, we can try and
invent an efficient way to spot it.
-Bennett
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Next message: Chris Horry: "Re: Forced delivery"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Forced delivery"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: smart anti flood tools"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: smart anti flood tools"
- Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: smart anti flood tools"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: smart anti flood tools"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]