|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: qmail, from bugtraq
From: Dan Hollis (goemon
sasami.anime.net)Date: Fri Feb 04 2000 - 13:58:18 CST
- Next message: Liviu Daia: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: PATCH(2) - smtpd_check_size() delayed so recipient(s) can be seen"
- In reply to: Marek Habersack: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Reply: Dan Hollis: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Marek Habersack wrote:
> > Of course, as a fraudulent marketing stunt, you carefully wrote _your_
> > attack programs so that they would only work after qmail was installed.
> > But security is defined by what _can_ be done, not by what _you_ did.
> Oh, yes. And making a program immune to some attack _can_ be done, yet it
> hadn't been.
And thats why people dont use qmail
- Next message: Liviu Daia: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: PATCH(2) - smtpd_check_size() delayed so recipient(s) can be seen"
- In reply to: Marek Habersack: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Reply: Dan Hollis: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]