|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?
From: Wietse Venema (wietse
porcupine.org)Date: Sun Feb 06 2000 - 08:04:51 CST
- Next message: Greg Stark: "Re: Relaying Performance"
- Previous message: Miguel A.L. Paraz: "reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- In reply to: Miguel A.L. Paraz: "reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Next in thread: Greg A. Woods: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Next in thread: LaMont Jones: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Reply: Greg A. Woods: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Reply: Ross Bogue: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Miguel A.L. Paraz:
> Hi all,
>
> I note that the vast majority of "Domain not found:" messages due to
> 'reject_unknown_sender_domain' are from misconfigured sender mail systems, or
> misspellings in user MTA's.
In my case, it is effective and catches a lot of bogus mail.
Wietse
- Next message: Greg Stark: "Re: Relaying Performance"
- Previous message: Miguel A.L. Paraz: "reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- In reply to: Miguel A.L. Paraz: "reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Next in thread: Greg A. Woods: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Next in thread: LaMont Jones: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Reply: Greg A. Woods: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Reply: Ross Bogue: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]