|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?
From: LaMont Jones (lamont
security.hp.com)Date: Sun Feb 06 2000 - 10:42:53 CST
- Next message: Jim Seymour: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Previous message: Greg Stark: "Re: Relaying Performance"
- In reply to: Miguel A.L. Paraz: "reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Next in thread: Jim Seymour: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Reply: LaMont Jones: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I note that the vast majority of "Domain not found:" messages due to
> 'reject_unknown_sender_domain' are from misconfigured sender mail systems, or
> misspellings in user MTA's.
If the mail bounces, and I have an undeliverable sender address, then
they'll never know. I find it better to reject such mail at the outset,
rather than having it disappear.
I find reject_unknown_sender_domain to be a very effective way to
get broken senders to fix their machines.
lamont
- Next message: Jim Seymour: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Previous message: Greg Stark: "Re: Relaying Performance"
- In reply to: Miguel A.L. Paraz: "reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Next in thread: Jim Seymour: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Reply: LaMont Jones: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]