|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?
From: Greg Stark (gsstark
mit.edu)Date: Sun Feb 06 2000 - 15:18:23 CST
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Relaying Performance"
- Previous message: Jesper Skriver: "Re: Relaying Performance"
- Next in thread: Liviu Daia: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Next in thread: Jim Seymour: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Maybe reply: Greg Stark: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Reply: Liviu Daia: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
jseymour
jimsun.LinxNet.com (Jim Seymour) writes:
> In message <20000206212029.A6527
tirad.internal.iphil.net>,
> dated Sun, 6 Feb 2000 21:20:29 +0800,
> "Miguel A.L. Paraz" <map
iphil.net> wrote regarding the subject
> "reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?":
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I note that the vast majority of "Domain not found:" messages due to
> > 'reject_unknown_sender_domain' are from misconfigured sender mail systems, or
> > misspellings in user MTA's.
>
> Then, IMO, they should fix them. I see no particularly good reason
> to cripple my MTA for the purpose of encouraging their incompetence.
Is this a transient error or a permanent error? If it's a permanent error then
I suggest your system is broken. It means that if your DNS server goes down or
if there's a major internet partition and you can't reach the outside world
then you'll reject all incoming mail with permanent errors.
A transient error does make sense here. In fact one suggested anti-spam
mechanism was to give transient error messages for all messages and cache the
envelope information. Then accept it the second time through. This is on the
theory that spammers generally don't ever retry whereas real mail will.
-- greg
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Relaying Performance"
- Previous message: Jesper Skriver: "Re: Relaying Performance"
- Next in thread: Liviu Daia: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Next in thread: Jim Seymour: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Maybe reply: Greg Stark: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Reply: Liviu Daia: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]