|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?
From: Ralf Hildebrandt (R.Hildebrandt
tu-bs.de)Date: Mon Feb 07 2000 - 00:45:24 CST
- Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "chroot-problem on Linux (glibc-2.1.2)"
- Previous message: Dylan Griffiths: "Re: qmgr logging breaks"
- In reply to: Jim Seymour: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Next in thread: Jim Seymour: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 05:22:08PM -0500, Jim Seymour wrote:
> Was this by chance in response to *my* comments? You didn't include
> any context and you *are* posting to a list, you know. (I suspect it
He included the In-Reply-To: header, and that's all a good MUA should need :)
Yes, the answer referred to you.
-- Ralf Hildebrandt <R.Hildebrandttu-bs.de> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb And when all the snow were burnt, yet ashes would remain
- Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "chroot-problem on Linux (glibc-2.1.2)"
- Previous message: Dylan Griffiths: "Re: qmgr logging breaks"
- In reply to: Jim Seymour: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Next in thread: Jim Seymour: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]