|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: qmail, from bugtraq
From: D. J. Bernstein (djb
cr.yp.to)Date: Mon Feb 07 2000 - 00:22:37 CST
- Next message: Joerg Klaas: "I'm getting crazy soon..."
- Previous message: NetQuest Support: "Re: Question about virtual Postfix patch"
- Next in thread: Dylan Griffiths: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Maybe reply: D. J. Bernstein: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
For the record: Lambertsen's statements are false. If qmail runs out of
memory, it defers the delivery attempt; i.e., it tries again later.
I can't speak for qmail-with-the-code-that-Lambertsen-inserted-into-it,
which is what Lambertsen means when he says ``qmail''; or for the
external delivery programs that Lambertsen was running.
If Lambertsen had ever reported his problems to me, I would have told
him to obtain a system-call trace. Any expert can easily read a trace to
see which program is behaving incorrectly.
As for Warfield's comments: http://cr.yp.to/qmail/warfield.html
---Dan
- Next message: Joerg Klaas: "I'm getting crazy soon..."
- Previous message: NetQuest Support: "Re: Question about virtual Postfix patch"
- Next in thread: Dylan Griffiths: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Maybe reply: D. J. Bernstein: "Re: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]