|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: multilog, was: qmail, from bugtraq
From: Ralf Hildebrandt (R.Hildebrandt
tu-bs.de)Date: Mon Feb 07 2000 - 08:10:51 CST
- Next message: Andy Ciordia: "RBL + Firewall = Complications?"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: multilog, was: qmail, from bugtraq"
- In reply to: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: multilog, was: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Next in thread: furio ercolessi: "Re: multilog, was: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: multilog, was: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 03:07:12PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Since I guess Wietse has correctly encapsulated all calls to syslog(),
> openlog() and closelog(), you can surely easily add multilog to postfix.
Hmm, multilog expects it's input to come from stdin, this might become tricky.
-- Ralf Hildebrandt <R.Hildebrandt
- Next message: Andy Ciordia: "RBL + Firewall = Complications?"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: multilog, was: qmail, from bugtraq"
- In reply to: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: multilog, was: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Next in thread: furio ercolessi: "Re: multilog, was: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: multilog, was: qmail, from bugtraq"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]