OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
Subject: Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?
From: Jim Seymour (jseymourjimsun.LinxNet.com)
Date: Mon Feb 07 2000 - 08:11:20 CST

> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 07:45:24 +0100
> From: Ralf Hildebrandt <R.Hildebrandttu-bs.de>
> Subject: Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain - still relevant?
>
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 05:22:08PM -0500, Jim Seymour wrote:
>
> > Was this by chance in response to *my* comments? You didn't include
> > any context and you *are* posting to a list, you know. (I suspect it
>
> He included the In-Reply-To: header, and that's all a good MUA should need :)

Hmmm... I've probably got that header auto-whacked. Perhaps I
should undo that. Anyway: as previously noted: my MUA is at
least mildly lame. But since it doesn't seem to do things overtly
damaging/dangerous/anti-social, I keep using it cuz I rather like
the user interface.

> Yes, the answer referred to you.

Thanks.

Regards,
Jim 

-- 
Jim Seymour                  | PGP Public Key available at:
jseymourjimsun.LinxNet.com  | http://www.cam.ac.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html
http://home.msen.com/~jimsun | http://www.trustcenter.de/cgi-bin/SearchCert.cgi