|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: High Performance Servers
From: Wolf Noble (wolf
eBay.COM)Date: Mon Feb 07 2000 - 16:54:09 CST
- Next message: Dan Hollis: "Re: Qmail Lovers Please Go Home"
- Previous message: Andrew McNamara: "Re: Question about virtual Postfix patch"
- In reply to: Aaron T Porter: "High Performance Servers"
- Next in thread: Aaron T Porter: "Re: High Performance Servers"
- Next in thread: Dan Hollis: "Re: Qmail Lovers Please Go Home"
- Reply: Wolf Noble: "Re: High Performance Servers"
- Reply: Aaron T Porter: "Re: High Performance Servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm currently running Ultra 10's with 256 megs of ram and a 3 disk stripe for
var
they have 300 outbound and 250 inbound connection maxes,
soon to move to sun Netra T1's with 512 megs of ram and a 6 disk stripe for
/var
Aaron T Porter wrote:
> I run a very busy postfix server, and I've had some problems in
> the past with a growing mail queue which then leads to
> unacceptable delivery times. I upped my smtp maxproc to 150, and
> that decreased my standing queue size by 90%, and I now almost
> constantly have 130+ smtp processes. How much farther is it
> reasonable to try and scale this? Does anyone else have more
> postfix tuning suggestions?
-- Wolf Noble System Administrator eBay Inc. Wolfebay.com
(408) 558-7563 (work) (408) 334-2203 (cell) (831) 338-6689 (home)
- Next message: Dan Hollis: "Re: Qmail Lovers Please Go Home"
- Previous message: Andrew McNamara: "Re: Question about virtual Postfix patch"
- In reply to: Aaron T Porter: "High Performance Servers"
- Next in thread: Aaron T Porter: "Re: High Performance Servers"
- Next in thread: Dan Hollis: "Re: Qmail Lovers Please Go Home"
- Reply: Wolf Noble: "Re: High Performance Servers"
- Reply: Aaron T Porter: "Re: High Performance Servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]