|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: $smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unauth_destination vs. check_relay_domains...
From: Brad Knowles (blk
skynet.be)Date: Fri Feb 11 2000 - 16:44:30 CST
- Next message: Brad Knowles: "Re: Scalability metrics?"
- Previous message: Brad Knowles: "Re: Scalability metrics?"
- In reply to: LaMont Jones: "Re: $smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unauth_destination vs. check_relay_domains..."
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: $smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unauth_destination vs. check_relay_domains..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 12:00 PM -0700 2000/2/11, LaMont Jones wrote:
> Which was why reject_unauth_destination came to be.
I tried that. It didn't strip off the username portion and try
just the domain, so it rejected the recipient.
> In other words, reject_unauth_destination should do what you want (it's
> what we're using, with lots of domains to relay). Is there a
> documentation problem that needs to be resolved??
It didn't work for me. I managed to solve the problem by having
my own hash table that I called directly, and included right before
reject_unauth_destination. This works, and is what I am likely to
use in production.
Now I just need to get it to relay everything that matches any of
those 3500+ domains to our POP server without doing any further
processing (except to convert the hostname into an IP address).
-- These are my opinions and should not be taken as official Skynet policy _________________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, <blkskynet.be> Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/726.93.11 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside. Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are.
- Next message: Brad Knowles: "Re: Scalability metrics?"
- Previous message: Brad Knowles: "Re: Scalability metrics?"
- In reply to: LaMont Jones: "Re: $smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unauth_destination vs. check_relay_domains..."
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: $smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unauth_destination vs. check_relay_domains..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]