|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Backup MX configuration
From: Wietse Venema (wietse
porcupine.org)Date: Mon Feb 14 2000 - 15:15:33 CST
- Next message: Kenn Martin: "Re: Backup MX configuration"
- Previous message: Kenn Martin: "Re: Backup MX configuration"
- In reply to: Kenn Martin: "Re: Backup MX configuration"
- Next in thread: Kenn Martin: "Re: Backup MX configuration"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Backup MX configuration"
- Reply: Kenn Martin: "Re: Backup MX configuration"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Well, you COULD drop the permit_mx_backup restriction and rely
on check_relay_domains for relay control.
Wietse
Kenn Martin:
> OH! Are there no other reject options to place in front of this
> directive to prevent this? Or is there another way to accomplish
> the same goal?
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 03:51:09PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > The permit_mx_backup restriction looks at the DNS, not at the
> > relay_domains parameter. If a host lists you as their backup,
> > then permit_mx_backup will accept the mail.
> >
> > Re: faster flushing: you can tweak the {min,max}imal_backoff_time
> > parameters.
> >
> > Wietse
>
> --
> Kenn Martin
> InfoTeam Lexington
>
>
>
- Next message: Kenn Martin: "Re: Backup MX configuration"
- Previous message: Kenn Martin: "Re: Backup MX configuration"
- In reply to: Kenn Martin: "Re: Backup MX configuration"
- Next in thread: Kenn Martin: "Re: Backup MX configuration"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Backup MX configuration"
- Reply: Kenn Martin: "Re: Backup MX configuration"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]