|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: address-rewriting SORRY
From: Jim Seymour (jseymour
jimsun.LinxNet.com)Date: Sun Feb 20 2000 - 07:24:08 CST
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: SASL"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: mappings and virus scanning problem"
- In reply to: Philipp Buehler: "Re: address-rewriting SORRY"
- Next in thread: Daniel Roesen: "Re: address-rewriting SORRY"
- Reply: Jim Seymour: "Re: address-rewriting SORRY"
- Reply: Daniel Roesen: "Re: address-rewriting SORRY"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Philipp Buehler <lists
fips.de> wrote:
>
> Andreas Burkhardt wrote To postfix-users
postfix.org:
[snip]
>
> > Think about it like an ISP, who wants get the mail which goes to
> > postmaster
of every domains he is administrading.
> You could "null" postmaster
, but not any unknown account.
> But in fact postmaster SHOULD be reachable on ANY domain :]
Postmaster going somewhere valid (preferably that a human reads) is a
requirement as per one-or-another RFC, is it not?
When I get legitimate e-mail bounced by my gateway at work by ORBS and
I track down someone at the offending domain to tell about it, as
frequently as not I find that they have no valid "Postmaster"
destination.
Ironically: one time it was one of those organizations that does ISO
9xxx certification. Another time an ISP. (Tho he had a valid
"Postmaster" destination, he never read the e-mail that landed there
because "he got too much." Wow.)
Regards,
Jim
-- Jim Seymour | PGP Public Key available at: jseymourjimsun.LinxNet.com | http://www.cam.ac.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html http://home.msen.com/~jimsun | http://www.trustcenter.de/cgi-bin/SearchCert.cgi
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: SASL"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: mappings and virus scanning problem"
- In reply to: Philipp Buehler: "Re: address-rewriting SORRY"
- Next in thread: Daniel Roesen: "Re: address-rewriting SORRY"
- Reply: Jim Seymour: "Re: address-rewriting SORRY"
- Reply: Daniel Roesen: "Re: address-rewriting SORRY"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]