|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: address-rewriting SORRY
From: Daniel Roesen (droesen
entire-systems.com)Date: Sun Feb 20 2000 - 08:56:22 CST
- Next message: Daniel Roesen: "Re: SASL"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: SASL"
- In reply to: Jim Seymour: "Re: address-rewriting SORRY"
- Reply: Daniel Roesen: "Re: address-rewriting SORRY"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 08:24:08AM -0500, Jim Seymour wrote:
> Postmaster going somewhere valid (preferably that a human reads) is a
> requirement as per one-or-another RFC, is it not?
No.
postmastersmtp-host is a MUST
postmasterdomain is a SHOULD
RTFRFCs :-)
Best regards,
Daniel
- Next message: Daniel Roesen: "Re: SASL"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: SASL"
- In reply to: Jim Seymour: "Re: address-rewriting SORRY"
- Reply: Daniel Roesen: "Re: address-rewriting SORRY"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]