OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
Subject: Re: Reply-To:, From: and Return-Path: funnies
From: Alexander Hoogerhuis (alexhlapper.hillington.grahamtech.co.uk)
Date: Fri Feb 25 2000 - 02:03:34 CST

Just did a "reply" and not a "followup" here. Let me get it right this
time. :)

To followup on myself here, Ive done some checking, what I have in my
sender_canonical, per user, is this:

shortname Long.Name
.
.
.

and at the end:

site.internal.co.uk somedomain.com

This should do the trick, no?

cheers,
Alexander

wietseporcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes:

> Reply-To: is rewritten as a recipient address; Return-Path: and
> From: are rewritten as sender address.
>
> So, if your rewriting differs for senders or recipients, then that
> could explain te difference.
>
> If this is wrong, that is, there are good arguments to rewrite
> Reply-To: as a sender address, then I can change Postfix.
>
> Wietse
>
> Alexander Hoogerhuis:
> >
> > We've recently changed over our comapny's mail from various versions
> > of sendmail and some severely hacked up sendmail.cf's to postfix. I'm
> > currently running 19991231-04 on all the machines, and I have one odd
> > problems occuring for some users it seems.
> >
> > Internally we use usersite.somedomain.[co.uk|.ie|.co.id|etc] but all
> > mail to leave the company should leave as Long.Nameourdomain.com.
> >
> > This seems to work fine in most cases but sometimes postfix decides to
> > leave the Reply-To: header to the internal domain, but corrently alter
> > the Return-Path: and From: headers.
> >
> > Does this ring any immeadiate bells at what could be at fault?
> >
> >
> > cheers,
> > Alexander
> >
> > --
> > Alexander Hoogerhuis | #include <stddisc.h>
> > Glasgow - Graham Technology |
> >
> >
> >
> > 

-- 
Alexander Hoogerhuis          | #include <stddisc.h> 
Glasgow - Graham Technology   |