|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical
From: Michael Ju. Tokarev (mjt
tls.msk.ru)Date: Fri Mar 03 2000 - 05:36:31 CST
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Previous message: Luis Melendez Aganzo: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- In reply to: Luis Melendez Aganzo: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Reply: Michael Ju. Tokarev: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Luis Melendez Aganzo wrote:
>
> >
> > Why not use aliases:
> >
> > root: user
that.other.machine
> >
>
> It is not the same as .forward ?
>
No. You will need to put .forward to nobody's home directory,
if that exists, not to root's one. Postfix is very careful
in avoiding root, even on this thing...
[]
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Previous message: Luis Melendez Aganzo: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- In reply to: Luis Melendez Aganzo: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Reply: Michael Ju. Tokarev: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]