|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical
From: Wietse Venema (wietse
porcupine.org)Date: Fri Mar 03 2000 - 07:35:24 CST
- Next message: Luis Melendez Aganzo: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- In reply to: Luis Melendez Aganzo: "Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Luis Melendez Aganzo:
> Hello all.
> After some testing I have just completely installed Postfix in all
> our mail machines. It works very well. Now I have a question: in some
> of our machines, I have a .forward for root that redirects mail to
> root
othermachine. That othermachine collects mail for root's of several
> machines and saves them in per-machine folders for some automated processing.
> If I put 'root root
localhost' in virtual, as advised in the documentation,
That example is for delivering LOCALLY. You want to deliver REMOTELY.
> Other solution is to put in canonical: root root
thismachine
> This works well, and has the advantage that all mails go with
> addresses 'root
machine', and I think this is convenient in the case
> of root.
>
> So, is there any drawback with this approach? If not, why the documentation
> advises to use virtual instead for root?
That's because you misread the documentation.
Wietse
- Next message: Luis Melendez Aganzo: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- In reply to: Luis Melendez Aganzo: "Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]