|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: size of mailbox
From: Bruno L. F. Cabral (bruno
openline.com.br)Date: Thu Mar 02 2000 - 16:21:02 CST
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Previous message: Luis Melendez Aganzo: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Next in thread: Bill Bradford: "Re: size of mailbox"
- Reply: Bill Bradford: "Re: size of mailbox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi there
> > The patch modifies the local delivery agent allowing it to check
> > the size of a mailbox prior to delivering the message. (It doesn't
> > work with maildir.) You set a default maximum size in your postfix
> > configuration file. If you need per-user settings, you can define
> > a map which holds them.
> I would guess if you store the mailbox files on a fs with quotas
> enabled, you could pretty much get away with any delivery agent,
> maildir or otherwise.
not a good solution if you don't have users on your servers ...
(everything is virtual i.e.)
currently, you can use cyrus deliver (and cyrus pop/imap) to achieve
this. there are patches to enable virtual domains in it on freshmeat
other solution is using maildrop's userdb option, courier imap and
qmails' qpop3d (the only one that I'm aware of that uses maildir)
a long term solution would be integrate the maildir++ part of maildrop
on the maildir local delivery agent of postfix
!3runo
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Previous message: Luis Melendez Aganzo: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Next in thread: Bill Bradford: "Re: size of mailbox"
- Reply: Bill Bradford: "Re: size of mailbox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]