|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical
From: Wietse Venema (wietse
porcupine.org)Date: Fri Mar 03 2000 - 08:06:49 CST
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Previous message: Bruno L. F. Cabral: "Re: size of mailbox"
- In reply to: Luis Melendez Aganzo: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Luis Melendez Aganzo:
> I have it configured right now this way:
> In canonical: root root
machinename....
> In /.forward: root
othermachine
>
> An it works! Mail is forwarded to the root account in othermachine with
> root
machinename in the headers, what is what I wanted to discriminate
> mail from roots of different machines.
> I don't see it delivered to nobody.
> Isn't this right?
So it is wrong for you to have different virtual maps, but it is
OK for you to have different canonical maps?
If it works for you, great. But it does not make a good example
for the Postfix documentation.
Wietse
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Previous message: Bruno L. F. Cabral: "Re: size of mailbox"
- In reply to: Luis Melendez Aganzo: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Question about root/virtual/canonical"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]