|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY
From: Vivek Khera (khera
kciLink.com)Date: Fri Mar 03 2000 - 12:54:29 CST
- Next message: Stuart Henderson: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Previous message: John Brooks: "Fatal Error"
- In reply to: Stuart Henderson: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Next in thread: Stuart Henderson: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Next in thread: Karimov, Rashid (NBC, CNBC): "RE: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Reply: Vivek Khera: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Reply: Stuart Henderson: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>>>> "SH" == Stuart Henderson <sheclipse.net.uk> writes:
SH> It's rather safer to use Postfix as the "null client".
How so if there's no daemon running?
- Next message: Stuart Henderson: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Previous message: John Brooks: "Fatal Error"
- In reply to: Stuart Henderson: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Next in thread: Stuart Henderson: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Next in thread: Karimov, Rashid (NBC, CNBC): "RE: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Reply: Vivek Khera: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Reply: Stuart Henderson: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]