|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY
From: Stuart Henderson (sh
eclipse.net.uk)Date: Fri Mar 03 2000 - 12:56:54 CST
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Fatal Error"
- Previous message: Vivek Khera: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- In reply to: Vivek Khera: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Next in thread: Karimov, Rashid (NBC, CNBC): "RE: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Reply: Stuart Henderson: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 01:54:29PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
> SH> It's rather safer to use Postfix as the "null client".
> How so if there's no daemon running?
If there's no daemon running, that'll be okay.
I had problems once with Sendmail nullclient and relay rules.
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Fatal Error"
- Previous message: Vivek Khera: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- In reply to: Vivek Khera: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Next in thread: Karimov, Rashid (NBC, CNBC): "RE: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Reply: Stuart Henderson: "Re: Some questions on postfix, SUMMARY"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]