OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
Subject: Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance...
From: Rafi Sadowsky (rafimeron.openu.ac.il)
Date: Sun Mar 05 2000 - 00:46:36 CST

On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, Wietse Venema wrote:

> Well let it be said that it is not possible to safely (*) create
> 1024 files in 2 seconds on today's IDE disks with a non-journaling
> file system. Doing so requires a multiple of 1024 disk updates in
> different places (directory blocks, file blocks, inode blocks),
> and disks just ain't that fast. At 10kRPM you have 3ms average
> rotational latency. You can do the math.
>
> Wietse
>
> (*) safely as in: should someone pull the plug the files must not
> be lost. In other words, Linux may have told you that the files
> are on disk, but in reality they aren't. Use a real file system
> for Postfix if you care about reliability.

 specifically for Linux: wouldn't "chattr +S" ( as implemented in
"postfix-script" ) fix this problem ?

rather strange though it Linux syslogging is synchronous by default - no ?

        Rafi