|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance...
From: Sander Steffann (sander
steffann.nl)Date: Sun Mar 05 2000 - 08:44:48 CST
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Is this possible with postfix?"
- Previous message: Parkhaev Vladimir: "Re: Is this possible with postfix?"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Sander Steffann: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Dylan Griffiths: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,
> Did you do the math? In order for me to spend more time on this
> discussion you will have to demonstrate a minimal amount of clue.
Why is everybody doing so difficult about this instead of trying to help?
The guy mentioned that he replaced the SCSI disk in the fast machine with an
IDE disk, and is still noticing a difference in favor of the IDE disk. This
means that on the same installation/configuration, with the only difference
the SCSI/IDE disk, there is a difference. He only asked if anybody had an
idea what could cause this.
And the only thing Brad, Rafi and Wietse do is telling him how stupid he
is!! Only because he asked a simple question.
I'm getting realy disappointed at the attitude on this list. Instead of
helping each other, you just tell everybody who notices something that seems
unlikely that they are stupid, don't know what they are doing, etc.
Who doesn't have a clue here?
Sander.
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Is this possible with postfix?"
- Previous message: Parkhaev Vladimir: "Re: Is this possible with postfix?"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Sander Steffann: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Dylan Griffiths: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]