|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance...
From: Justin Robertson (zulu
linux.com)Date: Sun Mar 05 2000 - 12:22:02 CST
- Next message: Parkhaev Vladimir: "Re: Is this possible with postfix?"
- Previous message: Sander Steffann: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Well, I'm glad to see that you've all assumed I'm a retard. Seeing as both
boxes have an identical install image, what you're suggesting still makes
no sense. It's not that one box has had certain features disabled or
enabled, and I do love the approach you take to your users questions.
Prehaps you'd like to tell me why sendmail outperformed postfix on the
SCSI machine then? hmm?
Justin Robertson
<zulu
linux.com>
On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I understand that I was assuming too much knowledge on the poster's
> side when I explained why today's IDE disks can't deliver the
> performance necessary for Postfix to do 500 email messages a second.
>
> I was assuming that someone who operates advanced hardware such as
> mentioned in the subject has a general understanding of operating
> systems, of file systems and of network protocols.
>
> That's not right. I apologize.
>
> Wietse
>
- Next message: Parkhaev Vladimir: "Re: Is this possible with postfix?"
- Previous message: Sander Steffann: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]