|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance...
From: sthaug
nethelp.noDate: Sun Mar 05 2000 - 14:23:01 CST
- Next message: Brad Knowles: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Previous message: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Maybe reply: sthaug
nethelp.no: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > UNIX file systems, esp those based on FFS, take great pains to
> > ensure that directories are updated in a safe manner.
>
> ... which is why it confuses me that FFS is so incredibly flaky.
> If you interrupt the power to a machine running FFS, quite
> frequently you will lose files. Sometimes files which had not
> even been accessed for weeks before the power interruption. Most
> of our machines, except those that are very new, have gaps in the
> /usr/src directory where some crash or other wiped files.
I'm sure you'll get lots of comments on this one. Let me just say that
your experience is completely contrary to my experience with FFS on
several different operating systems.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug
nethelp.no
- Next message: Brad Knowles: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Previous message: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Maybe reply: sthaug
nethelp.no: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]