|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance...
From: Cor Bosman (cor
xs4all.net)Date: Sun Mar 05 2000 - 18:40:15 CST
- Next message: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- In reply to: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Liviu Daia: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Cor Bosman: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
zulu
linux.COM (Justin Robertson) writes:
Hi Justin, did you make sure that your LVD HD is actually running at 80MB/s
and not at 10MB/s? Ive seen this happen quite often. Sometimes you need to
fiddle with the scsi bios.
(scsi0:0:0:0) Synchronous at 80.0 Mbyte/sec, offset 15.
Cor
- Next message: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- In reply to: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Liviu Daia: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Cor Bosman: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]